Skip to content
Law only · no product#Tranche2

Why Australia took 20 years to bring in Tranche 2

Published by GetPost Labs · Australia

The honest history of the gap — the reviews, the deferrals, and what finally changed. Context that makes the 2026 reforms make sense.

Where this law came from · Episode 3

Here is the question nobody quite answers. If the world named the gatekeepers decades ago, why is Australia only regulating them now, in 2026? The honest history is worth knowing.

2006 — the first tranche

In 2006, Australia passed its AML/CTF Act. But it only switched on for part of the economy — the banks and the financial sector. That was tranche one. The professions were always meant to follow.

The gap

And then they waited. For nearly twenty years, the second tranche — the gatekeepers — was deferred. Reviews recommended it. It kept not happening. That gap became Australia's most-noted weakness.

2024 — the gap closes
A key element of the reforms is to expand the AML/CTF regime to certain services provided by gatekeeper professions … (also known as 'tranche two' entities).
Explanatory Memorandum · Bill 2024
Explanatory Memorandum, AML/CTF Amendment Bill 2024 (Cth), para 13 · Attorney-General

So it isn't sudden, and it isn't personal. You are the second half of a plan written two decades ago. The banks went first. You were always the other half.

Twenty years, one tranche. Understanding the gap turns a surprise into a sequence — and puts you exactly where you belong in the story.